Sequence: Offense, Defense, Nonce-Sense…

After making my last post and seeing some of the horrible filth being posted in the comments, I had to take action. I didn’t like some of the insults being tossed around by various posters, especially ones who apparently hadn’t considered it a prerequisite to actually read my post before commenting. Then again maybe they felt it wasn’t something they had to read through, given most of what was published was their words placed in context– they had already said or heard them once, why re-read? I am heartened by the way they felt ashamed enough to remove their words later, so perhaps that’s a start? Still my biggest concern lay with those who came in and posted repetitively threats and allusions to sadism and other deviant activities.

After warning the worst of these and asking nicely the ones who were being offended and abused the most to hold off on their anger I sent off a message to blogger.com asking for succor based on the rampant and blantant violations of the TOS by Absolute Zero members.

Dear Blogger.com,

“[..P]lease follow his link and flag him for offensive content. You might want to flag all of his favourites as well, they are all offensive. The more people who flag a blog, the sooner it comes to the attention of blogger.”

I made an exhaustive blog post after being informed that a blog site was being created to advocate the discrimination of people by orientation. I was also told that they had begun a campaign of asking people to flag all the blogs bookmarked in a friend’s blog site. My link was one of them.In the course of researching the situation (see my blog post for details) I discovered the person who began this campaign of harassment had hidden her report button. Feeling this was unfair I immediately hid my navbar to prevent people reporting me simply because of my associations. Since then I have had members of ‘Absolute Zero’ posting threatening messages to the blog and generally refusing to *contribute* to the discussion other than by bashing people and attempting to hack their IP addresses for harassment purposes.
“[..C]omment moderation is the only course you have Blogger TOS please you are amatures tell ya what OLIVE FREAK[...]“

I have avoided deleting their abusive comments on sight because that would end any chances for intelligent discussion on the Paedophile hysteria. I sincerely think we as a society NEED to be able to discuss these things or the subject will only continue to fester hidden in a closet marked ‘Pay no Attention to Daddy’ and the situation will only get worse. I ask that since I am not violating the spirit of the TOS agreement you please take action on the threats and hate coming from hellpig.

Thank you!

–I*Love*Green*Olives

PS: Since I typed this hellpig has begun trying to masquerade as other other bloggers by changing his user name and user picture. Please help me, this is creating a disruptive presence on my blog and I want it to stop!

In the time since then I’ve been sitting back and waiting as the Absolute Zero people continued to happily take more and more rope to hang themselves with…or so I thought…

Hello,

Thanks for letting us know about this issue.

Unfortunately, it is not currently possible to block comments from particular users or IP addresses. However, please be aware that a blog owner can delete or moderate comments.

Sincerely, The Blogger Team

I couldn’t believe it! This was their idea of enforcing a TOS?? Furthermore, given the text of the email it was quite clear Blogger.com hadn’t given my words or my situation more than the most cursory glance. What did blocking the comments or ip addresses of anyone have to do with anything? I fully understand they likely get thousands of these types of reports every day, but could it hurt someone to read the words I wrote? Clearly illiteracy is a bigger problem than I thought!

Apparently the TOS agreement aside, Blogger.com has no problems with allowing its members to use their accounts to follow people all over their network of blogs threatening people and harassing them simply for existing! Inconceivable! The Absolute Zero trolls have made it more than clear their issues with us have little to do with any actions on the part of paedophiles and everything to do with our thoughts. If we were to go lock ourselves up in a far off place with just food and water away from all human contact they would still be burning up inside with rage because we might be thinking something! Yes, really…our thoughts will somehow pollute the world around us as infect everyone with our Paedophile disease! Oh Noes!!!!!! 111111oneoneone

The human race has one really effective weapon, and that is laughter. –Mark Twain

And it is laughter I intend to begin using as my sword. I will continue to make posts about the cultural aspects and will continue my defense of Paedophilia whenever I see it mentioned in the news, but I have recently been offered a place as team member at Absolutely Nothing a new parody blog that will focus on the most extreme actions of Teleiophiles and their disgusting attempts to remake American and International culture conform to their prejudices and feeble minded limitations. Bottom line? This entire situation with the Absolute Zero people has shown me clearer than ever there is Absolutely Nothing to their claims we are sick individuals and a major proof is in their blogs. When they were first started they were filled with comments by both factions, the antis (frothing at the mouth and tossing threats around) and the Paederotics, offering thoughtful feedback and discussion on the issues and the facts. The contrast shows up loud and clear– it is quite easy to discern who has a case or valid argument and who is simply spewing off propaganda and feeding off of emotions. People get bored with and tired of the lack of substance quickly. Besides a small cadre of posters, the AZ blog is almost empty, and given Hellpig’s claims about their member size it seems entirely possible all that goes on at AZ is intellectual masturbation to an ever smaller audience.

Not that it says much given the way Hellpig has made himself at home here. He actually seems to spend more time trolling my blog in the comments than he does on his own blogs, if I were the type to believe all antis are paedophiles in disguise I’d find that pretty interesting. I could probably make hay with his obsession with baseball bats and anal cavities. ..But I won’t say anything of the kind because that would be being rude!

Hellpig brings up an interesting factor though, I’d like to introduce a new team member to this blog, LGsinmyheart whose offered to help me police the comments section now. I have asked and LGsinmyheart has accepted to keep an eye on things here when I’m doing certain other things–like sleeping! We will be working out a schedule for monitoring that should hopefully allow this blog to continue without the necessity of comments monitoring (actually comments pre-approval) and also allow us to continue to allow anonymous comments to be posted. I don’t expect people in the comments section to suddenly become little angels or to read our minds in what to and to not post, I simply expect people to be polite in their disagreements. This goes for members of the Paederotic community as well.

Disagreement is acceptable but belligerent insults are not! posting without reading is an insult!

Disagreement is acceptable. Belligerent insults, showing by your posts you have not actually read the blog is not. Drive by posts advising anyone who reads to commit suicide or self mutilation is also not acceptable. Discussing whether or not castration has any affect on sex drive and or orientation is acceptable. Allegations of criminal activity will be removed as soon as it is seen. That includes lurid descriptions of violence against paedophiles as well as the standard definitions of criminal activity used at GirlChat. The latter means no one in the paedophile community should be confused on what will get their words deleted.

For those of you who read here from outside the community please try to understand disagreement is not the issue; being able to disagree politely. Most of the people I know in the Paedophile community have not committed any crimes and likely will never do so. Statistically speaking many many Paedophiles live, breathe and walk amongst us all every day and will continue doing so, living in the toy box until the day they die with no one knowing they were anything more than they seemed. Try to understand the members of the community love children –in every way– not just sexually. We care for and want the best for them, which is why it is so infuriating for us to be constantly compared to and alleged to be like those psychopaths we hear about in the news. We can and in my honest opinion should be able to work together on issues we agree with each other on. I have been saying that from day one and will likely say it long after this post.

So to new friends and acquaintances I say, ‘Welcome!’ to all our enemies I’d apologize for the new rules, (but you really did bring them upon yourselves,) and invite you to stick around for awhile– who knows maybe you’ll learn something?

–I*Love*Green*Olives

UPDATE! More Hellpig info

The Ranando Report had an interesting post about the infamous AZ troll..

You can read the report on Hellpig here.

I don’t know how accurate this informationis, but when I read it all I could think was: Windows ME? No really… WinME? I LOL’ed! ^o^;

Hints Allegations and Things Left Unsaid…

Something’s going wrong inside of you
Burdens bearing down and seeping through
Well, I don’t want to bleed anymore for you
And I don’t want to breathe any hatred too
–Wasting Time, Collective Soul 1994

Over the past 48 hours I have been inundated with hate messages which are comments that pedophiles are attempting to post to my blog. — Daydreamer of Oz

She makes such pretty allegations of our ‘hate messages’ in her blog and this prompted her to start Absolute Zero as a counterattack.

It has come to my attention that I am not the only one being bullied by these guys on the net. — Daydreamer of Oz

And she wants YOU to join in with her and fight against the ‘bullying’ behavior of my brothers and sisters. Her appeal for help has spread through the blogosphere like wildfire, creating an unbelievable sense of unity as people join in on the digital witch-hunt. Lines of division have nearly disappeared as left joins right in single-minded pursuit of ’stopping the bullies’ from ‘intimidating’ Daydreamer and the ‘good guys’ are encouraged to join in the fight…
My Stance
[Rookie,] you suggested in your post that perhaps we don’t listen enough to what the anti-pedos have to say. Bull-fucking-shit. We listen to their venom day and night, every single day of the week, every single time we pick up a magazine or watch the latest TV talk show or police drama where they are attacking and misrepresenting us… –Dissident

..it has come to my attention that one of our bloggers is being attacked by a group of pedophiles, these people want the rest of us to accept this perversion as if it were a human rights movement. –Bushwack

…a blog called Daydreamer of Oz (a well written blog, BTY) that is under attack by pedophiles. Go over and offer some support. You might want to leave a comment letting the world know just what you think of child molesters. –Lemuel Calhoon

I have a blog called the Metal Pundit, and I also blog with BigNewsDay. We all support you and will help in whatever way to stop pedophiles. –Lefty Metalhead

I found these sicko’s who are listed as friends on debatecrime along with this freak Viamund the Rake after pedophiles started bombarding my daughter with hate mail and of course arguments for their disease. Daydreamer is staying strong in refusing them any voice at all on her blog. –Stitches77

As if that were not enough, members of the MAA community have begun to join in chiding and telling us we need to calm down. Most notably we have Rookie Revolyob of Paiderastia and Wikipedia fame posting to GirlChat and his own blog the following comments:

This ain’t cool, people. As much as I might dispise [sic] some of the thinking that goes on in the minds of people who don’t agree with me, I personally always attempt my damndest [sic] to keep my cool and respond patiently and responsibly to whatever a person might say. –Rookie

The problem is all this is ‘nonce-sense’ and Rookie has found himself very much taken in by people playing the victim card.

You Have Awakened a Sleeping Giant…

I made my bed and I sleep like a baby
With no regrets and I don’t mind sayin’
It’s a sad sad story when a mother will teach her
Daughter that she ought to hate a perfect stranger
And how in the world can the words that I said
Send somebody so over the edge
That they’d write me a letter
Sayin’ that I better shut up and sing
Or my life will be over
–Not Ready To Make Nice, Dixie Chicks 2006

Recently I made a brief post regarding Dutch paedophiles who are hoping to form a political party. A group of paedophile activists found this and immediately began trying to use my blog as a platform to push their agenda please accept us and say we’re ok. When I said this would not happen and began moderating comments, the true trouble began. I was bombarded with emails of many descriptions. These ranged from mere ‘explanations’ of why I am wrong in stating that paedophilia is not acceptable to more threatening and hateful comments. — Daydreamer of Oz

So inncocent sounding, isn’t it? ‘I made a post and these people attacked me!!!1 1one’ Only the truth is somewhat different because if you look at what actually happened…

I’m like the coolest person on the planet! I succeeded in provoking Doc enough to get him to follow me over & respond. All hail Daydreamer — Daydreamer of Oz

Seeing as how the ‘Doc’ in question is a member in Blogger I surfed over to see what the debate was about…

As far as offending pedophiles goes, what about it? The one in question may not be the most well spoken or rational when it comes to debating these issues, but he has every right to be offended by anyone putting him in the same boat as criminals. Declaring “pedophile” to be synonymous with “child molester” is no different than declaring “heterosexual” to be synonymous with “rapist”. [...] Perhaps the most intriguing part of it all is that you posted this hate-group rhetoric on a public blog and really expected nothing but support…
–Demosthenes
One of my regular readers responded to my previous post about the abolition of suspended sentences, disagreeing with my argument. Whilst I’m more than happy to be disagreed with (I love nothing more than a vigorous debate), the comment prompted me to reflect on some of the misconceptions that people have in regards to offending and criminality. [...] That’s both completely correct and entirely misleading. Of course, you wouldn’t know that if you didn’t read the study yourself.

This result by the BJS is pretty consistently reflected in the sex offender research literature. Zgoba and Simon (2005), doing a seven-year follow up of nearly 500 sex offenders who attended a treatment program in New Jersey found a recidivism rate for sex offenders of 14%, compared to 24% for nonsexual reoffending. Studies which have found much higher rates of recidivism for sex offenders have been found to contain sampling biases which have affected the outcomes of the study (see, for example, Webster, Gartner & Doob, 2006). — dr. faustus

The nice thing about linking this is how it shows Daydreamer and her cohorts to be completely disingenuous when they pretend to be ignorant of facts. It is clear here by the discussion she is knowledgeable but chooses to follow the mantra of not wishing to be confused with the facts because her mind is made up!

* Most (90% to 98%) child molesters are “situational offenders” who abuse children because of stress or because they need a “power fix”.

I like how these magic numbers keep popping up. If you are going to state these things as facts, you need to reveal your sources. Until then, this is just your opinion.Daydreamer of Oz

I’ll give you a bone Daydreamer–check the picture here with the graph. It’s a little out of date (2004) and if you know of any thing more recent I’d be thrilled to know where you found it so I can add the link to my posts and update my data. Then see here and here. The information is out there even if most of it is buried in pathology and criminal investigation work. Just like it was once buried when the big targets were homosexuals. Not that I think you need me to tell you this, given how literate you seemed to be on this subject when dueling with the good doctor I’m given to think your claims of ignorance are based more on strategy than actual lack of knowledge. Also I’d like to remind you and my other readers the large percentage of pedophiles do not come into contact with minors sexually at all and are law abiding citizens. The figures used above and the sources indicated are stuck using figures gained from criminal respondents due to the very pedophile panic Daydreamer and her cohorts seek to perpetuate.

Going back to the hows and whys and wherefores of how this all started, Daydreamer made a purposely flamatory post on her blog in which she said in part:

If your stance on this issue is that pedophilia is a sexual orientation, then there’s nothing wrong with this scenario, is there? I can’t get my bp down low enough to write more about it so help me fill in the gaps, people –Daydreamer of Oz

To this plea for ‘help’ in understanding our friend Lepidopterist posted:
I was completely sickened by that web site. People like that do not deserve to breathe. I may be on the opposite end of the political spectrum from you, but all of you have my complete support in taking on these sick #^^%’s –BigNewsDay

Dear Daydreamer,You start your post with an error: pedophilia is not a crime. The orientation of pedophilia is the attraction of adults to minors, not the abuse of them. This is such a common error but ti has to be pointed out for the sake of clarity.

The NVD is certainly a strange party, advocating besides pedophilia public nudity, animal sex and even daytime porn (!)

However, the point in such a party as the NVD is to give the oppressed a voice, as pedophilia – or the attraction some normal adults have to minors – has been misunderstood for too long.

The NVD is not a party with serious hopes of taking control of the Netherlands, a country firmly within the grasp of the Evil Empire but it may take a seat or two.
Furthermore please do not associate pedophiles with any people like murderers or maniacs. This sort of callous insult is what created the NVD in the first place.

Worrying isn’t it?

Instead of taking the opportunity to engage Lepidopterist in an honest discussion when he was answering her request for information, Daydreamer fired back with insults and told him:

Lepidopterist,

Pedophilia is a crime.

There are no normal adults who are attracted to minors.

I will continue to associate pedophiles (as I see from clicking on your link that you are one) with murderers and maniacs because they’ve all got psychological problems that allow them to hurt other people.

You need to seek psychological counselling rather than flaunting your perversion across the net.

Then to add injury to the insults she already tossed out she proceeded to make a new blog post, complaining at the rudeness of someone posting in response to a question she asked. Worse she compounded her earlier insulting language — which Lepidopterist had already requested politely she quit doing — with more of the same and a request for all her readers:Winston Smith A.K.A. Debatecrime [aka] Lepidopterist Lives in [..inaccurate..] is a diseased delusional freak, I never gave you Death threats, I merely stated we are going to play a game of “Pulp Fiction” and you will be playing the GIMP So practice climbing in and out of a small box “Gimp” –Hellpig

It takes a hell of a lot of nerve for an admitted pedophile to come to my blog and say that I’m offending him by comparing him to a sexual criminal. [...] If you are like me and find this extremely offensive, please follow his link and flag him for offensive content. You might want to flag all of his favourites as well, they are all offensive. The more people who flag a blog, the sooner it comes to the attention of blogger. I am also investigating possible routes of further action. –Daydreamer of Oz

If anyone sees any of these types of sites, please click the “Flag” link at the top of the page to let Blogger know that you find web sites promoting the molestation of children offensive.–BigNewsDay

It was an understandably incredulous Lepidopterist who went to GirlChat and asked: “What FURTHER ACTION???” The general consensus was Daydreamer would try to report his blog to Blogger– and since Lepidopterist has broken no laws in his blog — Blogger would ignore him. A few of the people on GirlChat posted that they had posted on the board and copied their posts as part of the message they left on the board regarding the discussion. One person asked where Daydreamer’s report box was, then decided to just make a reply to the blog and hope for the best. His reply was also posted at GirlChat. It brings up an interesting question though…

What gives her the right to report others when she has removed that function and is not herself subject to such reporting?

I Have Not Yet Begun to Fight…

Get Up, Stand Up, stand up for your right
Get Up, Stand Up, don’t give up the fight
Get Up, Stand Up. Life is your right
So we can’t give up the fight
Stand up for your right, Lord, Lord
Get Up, Stand Up. Keep on struggling on
Don’t give up the fight

We’re sick and tired of your ism and skism game
Die and go to heaven in Jesus’ name, Lord
We know when we understand
Almighty God is a living man
You can fool some people sometimes
But you can’t fool all the people all the time
So now we see the light
We gonna stand up for our right
–
Get Up, Stand Up Bob Marley & Peter Tosh 1973

I can track the url from which visitors enter my blog [...] They’re telling all their goons to come over and tell me how crazy and hateful I am. It is becoming increasingly clear that their agenda is to bully, threaten and otherwise attempt to intimidate me into silence. — Daydreamer of Oz

Most of these fools are everyday people you see on the street. They are not living some isolated life like most would think. They are out there, everywhere. You might even work with a few of them. That’s what disgusts me. Just knowing that I might acually associate with one and not know it. Pedophiles dare not say what they beleive in public because they know they will get the living shit beat out of them. And rightfully so. So in conclusion, do the world a favor and murder a pedophile. –Anonymous

I guess he didn’t like my posting? I only told him we were going to play “Pulp Fiction” and to guess which part he was playing…. Oh then I told him I was going to castrate him when I get to the UK –Hellpig

Child sex offenders need be shot in the head in town square, period. –Malinda777

I personally can’t believe that there are so many pedophiles “coming out” online. How disgusting! Thank God I’m not one of these people; but if I was I would hope I would have the good sense to shoot myself… ‘mary’

You may also find it interesting to note that of all the people I know they’ve harassed, they’ve all been women. Not one man. We are starting a blog to combat these morons so check back with me soon! P.S. I suggest we go with [Anonymous'] idea –Daydreamer of Oz

And they wonder why we are offended? This woman and her ilk run around spewing their hate, their incitement to murder, their attempts to censor the speech of others… Oh and for the record we have posted to men in attempts to discuss the issues–all of our posts have disappeared into the black hole known as comments moderation. In fact I’m honestly skeptical that you or your friends have actually gotten any ‘hate email’ because when you attempted to justify the launch of your new hate speech blog: Absolute Zero you had to dip into the messages posted on a forum for pedophiles. Messages quoted out of context usually — because there was no reason why my words had to have been brought into things when you were trying to quote Lepidopterist — and usually relayed in frustration that you and your friends had chosen to slander and wax eloquent about the various methods you could murder innocent people while denying them a opportunity to defend themselves.

It is very easy to be brazen and bold under the cover of anonymity. These people can only pick on an adult when they *believe* there’s no way for the other person to find out who and where they are. [...] You know that you’re sick and deranged and that’s why you keep your secret on the net anonymously. — Daydreamer of Oz

Pot. Kettle. Black?

Keep in mind that it is not I who started this fight. This whole thing began when you decided to not only demonize an individual but also an entire class of human beings. It was you who made this post inevitible, when you decided to encourage people to report blogs sight unseen the only offense commited was in being born with an orientation they had no control over. Did you choose to be white? A woman? Did you make the choice to be heterosexual? Neither did we choose to be who we are. What right then do you make war against us?

Paedophilia, is an orientation–deny it all you want– and it is not a crime. It is not immoral. There is nothing wrong with an attraction. There is no sin involved in loving someone. In fact it amazes me that a God who took the time to explain in lurid detail why he hates Clams, oysters, crabs, lobsters, and shrimp and yet he is somehow unable to take the time out to discuss pedophilia. At ALL. Perhaps he forgot? I mean the worst sin in the world– it “kills souls” you know– and God just completely manages to forget to say anything about it? Or maybe your confusion is because whenever you define pedophile you always use the words from the psychopath listing?

I don’t know. I do know nature itself conspires against you. Puberty has been coming at an earlier age in nearly all cultures and the trend shows that continuing to be the case. Studies continue to come out that mock your opinions. What else are we to make of the recent news that your life expectancy is largely determined by the age your mother was at birth? That said I don’t expect you or any of your cohorts to change anytime soon and you don’t have to. We Paederotics have learned from the lessons of history all we really have to do is wait you out — you fools! Did you really delude yourselves into thinking it was only about sex? Projection much? While you and your third husband are shopping the children back and forth in between your busy schedules and big screen televisions we’re the ones they’ll turn to. There’s a reason why children continue to turn to those of my community– it’s because we really do care for them and they can sense our sincerity.
my perspective v2.0
and i have a message for you – a message from one of an entire race
of pipers, and it is this:

get rid of your own rats this time. this time around we will not
do it for you, nor will we lead your kids away.

but remember one thing:

if you don’t – your children will follow us of their own accord,
and you will not be able to stop them.

so clean up your act – ok?
–AlbertRoss

Honestly its those of you who are so virulently sex-negative that worry me the most! Statistically you’re the most likely of all people to snap and do something unforgivable to ‘your’ children and harm the ones we love. You find us untrustworthy because we refuse to repress ourselves and see ourselves as victims? I find your unhealthy preoccupation with supressing your sex drives and the negative body image problems you posion your progeny with even more disturbing! Scroll back up the page and look at figure 5-2 again. There’s a reason why the vast majority of those who abuse children sexually are parents or other ‘guardian’ figures. It’ss because those of you in that position who have bought into the sick idea you own ‘your’ children are but one step away from using your property for your own selfish gratification.

Can we at long last dispense with the overused, beaten to death, sterotype of Stranger Danger? The fact remains– no matter how much it is attempted silence the truth– the fact remains the biggest dangers to your children are not paedophiles. You know this! The biggest danger to your children are you yourselves. Parents. Uncles. Stepfathers. The self-actualized paedophile is the one who will ask and accept yes and no for an answer. Parents and other authority figures have long been accustomed to simply taking what they want and forcing children to comply with their wishes. In my book that’s a precursor to rape. How DARE you project that on to us! How dare you make us the fall guys for your actions! How DARE you get on your high horses when we respond to provocation and declare us to be once again your convient scapegoats!

–I*Love*Green*Olives (who could go on and on with this subject but has decided to save it for the next post)

Girl Says She Lied; Thanking ‘Angry Momma’

Jury rules not guilty for man charged with sex with girl, 14

A Summit County Common Pleas jury returned a not guilty verdict this afternoon in the unlawful sexual conduct trial of Galo Sanchez-Pesantes.

The 20-year-old was charged with having sex with a minor, a 14-year-old, in a Jan. 20 incident at her parents’ Norton home.

The eighth-grade girl was jailed 12 days after Judge James E. Murphy ordered her held after she ran away and was not available to testify against her alleged assailant.

She was released from jail when Ohio 9th District Court of Appeals Judge Lynn Slaby said the girl was being illegally held without a hearing.

The girl testified in court on Wednesday. She told the jury she had lied about her age to the defendant.

I’m not sure how much of a win this actually is though, especially now with the spin machine activated–the above is quoted from the Beacon Journal, but take a look at this article, where the girl says she lied about her age and told several conflicting stories about what actually occurred. Also interesting in the second article is the claim it was the girls’ mother who caught the two in the act–and no mention of mom’s boyfriend. I’m also puzzled by how Sanchez-Pesantes apparently knew where the mom’s liquor was unless he was a friend of the family in some way? Not to mention the fact our girl here has apparently gained a lawyer…

I strongly suspect there’s a made for TV movie on this subject soon to come. I also think we’re not getting the full story–but that’s typical in these types of cases, isn’t it? I’m sorry its been so long since I updated the blog and that I’ve only made a small post — I do have longer posts being worked on, I just haven’t been able to finish them. I seem to be blocked at the moment. More will be posted as I can find the time.

–I*Love*Green*Olives

PS: I recently posted on a blog known as Angry Momma‘ thanking her for her hard work in pulling together all the different pedophile blogs and Live Journals in one place and making it easy to find new friends. Somehow she just didn’t seem to appreciate the thanks…some people just don’t understand how to take a compliment. In any case please be sure to stop by Angry Mommas blog every so often to meet new people and discover new blogs–not to mention Angry Momma also seems to be in the child model promotion business and if she keeps on posting new models you may see someone new by way of visiting!

Also, be sure to submit your own blogs and those of others for perusal and hopefully inclusion on the Angry Momma Pedophile blog ring! She’s doing a wonderful service for us (whether she knows it or not) by putting all the great GLer and BLer blogs and site links in one place so we can find them easier! Demosthenes posted a sample post over at GirlChat, which despite being as snarky as hell is the correct tone to take. Do NOT be rude in your comments, just politely thank the woman for her efforts. Thank her for introducing us to new pedo blogs! Tell her how much you appreciate her (unintentional) promotion of child models! Encourage her to blog about your blogs or sites!

She isn’t replying at the moment, according to her other blog she’s been incredibly busy with the memorial day weekend and you won’t see anything for awhile because she has comments moderation on. Oh–you will need a blogger account to post now. She’s disabled anonymous posting for some reason.

Update: Political Prisioner

Update: Political Prisioner

I’ll try to make a more comprehensive post on this subject later, I’m simply to outraged to do a reasonable post on the subject at the minute…

Mother says 14-year-old safer in jail

At first blush several thoughts come to mind right off, why is Galo Sanchez-Pesantes a twenty year old being the focus of persecution…(err I meant… aww #### it at this point the words are interchangeable! Sometimes OpenOffice.org Writer is smarter than I am when it comes to ’speeling’ and this is one of them.) Let me try this again.

At first blush several thoughts come to mind right off:

Why is Galo Sanchez-Pesantes a twenty year old being the focus of persecution when the mother claims there is a twenty-six year old boyfriend still out there? Why was the mother silent on the twenty-six year old boyfriend but so desperate to nail this twenty year old Hispanic man she is willing to force her daughter to stay in adult jail?

Supreme Being Judge James Murphy feels comfortable enough to joke about the case?!? From the news article: “Is this the (case) where I effectively kidnapped (a victim)?” Murphy asked as the case was called.

His Holiness the Judge also says the girl is not entitled to a court-appointed lawyer. Because “She’s a witness, not a defendant,” yet when He ordered her to jail May 10, Murphy set the girl’s bond at $500. If she’s not a defendant then what need is there for a Bond?

Also after doing some googling I’ve discovered this isn’t the first time Chief Prosecutor Mary Ann Kovach cared more about ‘winning’ the case than justice and she has in the past fought tooth and nail to keep a man cleared by DNA evidence from being released from prison. This troubles me greatly.

I have much much more to say, but I’m going to stop now before I get so angry I am unable to type clearly. More details on this subject in the post from yesterday…

Thankfulness and Review

This is not the post I’d planned on making.

Having to post an update to the Political Prisoner post pushed this one down in priority. I still want to make a brief post on the subject… I’d intended to make this post a snarky thank you note to well known publicity hound Stacy, from Active Christian Media, who endorses known pervert Bill O’Reilly because there are no “example[s] of a Christian who is dealing with this issue.” The important issue? Eliminating the ability of sex offenders to earn minimum wage working at McDonnalds. This says something about her grasp on Christian morals, I’m sure but am unfortunately not sure what it says, other than perhaps Stacy L. Harp is willing to support whatever agenda gets the most ears to tune into her spam blog so she can hawk the books of her sponsors. Given that half of the sex crimes in certain places are committed by children, I’m sure that her and O’Reilly’s support of eliminating the ability of these children to support themselves is all for the children’s own good. Also ironic is the post currently on the front page about unconditional love and forgiveness. Apparently since Stacy and her followers have decided pedophiles are subhuman, and life unworthy of life– they see no point in worrying about forgiveness for them. Such a loving Christian attitude, it brings to mind the famous Ghandi quote: “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Where is the Love of Christ in His Church? Indeed; you should ask this question!

Yet I digress when I have a serious and pressing issue to bring to the attention of all who read this blog, so I’d simply like to thank Stacy for her wonderful work in rallying the troops. Thanks to her anti-freedom of expression, anti-first-amendment, anti-freepress (remember our Stacy is not a blogger she only writes to get attract enough attention to con you into listening to her advert– I mean podcast) campaign of hate-speech and innuendo– Pedologues was taken down from one part of the Internet and moved to another. She and her allies called it a victory. Those of us in the Paederotic community saw it as a call to arms and responded by creating blog after blog after blog after blog. Thanks to Stacy’s actions I know of at least fourteen new blogs that have gone up, and these are only the ones I know of personally through interaction at various websites. I am constantly stumbling across more every day. You have unleashed the hydra, cut off one head and we will spawn another one to take its place! You and your allies seem to have forgotten the basic rule of human nature; the more you attempt to silence someone, the louder their voices will become! And I needed to take a brief time out here to thank you for your actions. We truly couldn’t have ever done it with out you! Thank you for being the one who inspired us to come out of our shells! =)

–I*Love*Green*Olives

Political Prisoners

What do you call it when someone is jailed without access to a lawyer, secluded contact from fellow inmates, and held indefinitely pending their willingness to perjure testimony in a legal case? No this is not a situation happening in Iran or whatever the newest axis on the trinity of evil is this week, this is a case occurring in America’s back yard. When a fourteen year old girl refused to appear in court for where she is the material witness the state prosecutor and judge presiding over the case decided she needed protection when their case against her boyfriend fell apart. Furious that the boyfriend in question, twenty year old Galo Sanchez-Pesantes was released for lack of evidence, Common Pleas Judge James Murphy (picture to the left) attempted to have the girl the supposed victim of a crime sent to juvenile detention for refusing to cooperate. According to court papers written by Juvenile Court Judge Linda Tucci Teodosio, (photo to the right,) federal law prohibits the detention of juveniles who are not accused of a crime. She blocked the move stating she could not legally hold the girl. Unwilling to be deterred by mere mortal law, the Supreme Being also known as Judge James Murphy ordered the fourteen year old girl to be held indefinitely in an adult facility. That was the Wednesday of last week, since then the girl has been held at the Summit County Jail where she has been in isolation. The brave girl has requested to speak with a lawyer, a fact documented by court papers but Jail Captain Steve Finical has confirmed local prosecutors refused anyone to see her.

The case first started back in January of this year when the boyfriend of the girl’s mother claims to have seen the two on a couch. She denied having sex and has steadfastly refused to write a statement for police. The situation has the boyfriend’s defense attorneys confused at the actions of Prosecutor Mary Ann Kovach. “I’m puzzled that prosecutors want to go forward with this when they have a witness saying she didn’t have sex with this man. It seems to me they’re holding her to coerce her testimony. Frankly, I think she’s being illegally held.” Brouse said.

The other attorney continued in this same vein. “When you take a child and put her in jail and deny her access to counsel because she refuses to be labeled a material witness, essentially it’s an abuse of power,” Folk said. “I don’t think the state has the right to put a 14-year-old in jail without due process. And in this case, there has been no due process.”

“She said no, nothing happened [..] and she said she told that to everyone, but no one wanted to listen,” Brouse agreed.

Despite blocking the first attempt to imprison the girl, Judge Linda Tucci Teodosio has gone silent on the matter and has not returned any phone calls.

A message was left with his Holiness, Supreme Pontiff James Murphy by way of his bailiff but his holiness is above the mundane things of mortals and has also chosen not to comment.

The girl’s mother could not be reached for comment but since this is the same mother who called police and had them take the teen into custody, this should not be a surprise.

The only one willing to speak to the media on the issue besides the defense team was Chief Prosecutor of the case, Mary Ann Kovach who defended their atrocious actions with the feeble defense: “[We need to hold her] so that she is not on the streets where we can’t find her or she’s doing things she shouldn’t be doing. It’s better for her to be confined,” she concluded.

Sanchez-Pesantes, though free on bond is required to appear before the Lord of Creation James Murphy this Tuesday morning for pretrial proceedings now that the state has its primary witness in custody again. Bottom line? The unidentified fourteen year old is little more than a political pawn. The only reason why Kovach is getting away with this is because as legal property of her mother the girl is unable to exercise her rights. Even the negative rights so many antis are so fond of discussing, such as the right to be free from coercion have been taken away from her. I think this whole situation is disgusting! What say ye?

Sources Cited

Sources of information for this news are from the following places:

CNN

Beacon Journal

WKYC Channel Three News

News Net Channel Five

Outraged? Contact Someone!

Congressman Sherrod Brown.

Ohio ACLU

Senator George Voinovich

Senator Michael DeWine

Governor Taft

West Side Leader (newspaper)

–I*Love*Green*Olives (hoping this girl gets her physical freedom without sacrificing her mental freedom)

A Rather Overdue Post…In Three Parts

The Experience Fallacy (Or ‘When I Was Your Age…’ Exposed)

I blogged about the unfortunate reaction that my friend Ella has been getting from her blog a few days ago. Since she is under the age of eighteen, predictably people have begun to come out of the landscape insisting that due to her age she cannot possibly have an opinion on the big issues. Not a valid one at any rate.

Thankfully some of them have since then started to reconsider their positions—at least as far as trying to pretend Ella is unable to have her own opinions on youth rights. They still believe that her Paederotic friends aren’t capable of being real friends to her because of our orientations. One wonders what their opinions would be on the subject if Ella had made her way to Boy Chat and was spending her time talking with them about the boys her own age she liked? This is assuming that Ella is into boys, but I’m not about to speculate on that land mine—I know all too well what the act of assumption does and have little desire to be an ass. I just think it amusing to speculate on the arguments our opponents would use in that case, since the BoyChat members would obviously have no interest in getting in to her pants. Wrong gender for one.. ;P

Still this whole thing highlights one of the major absurdities of the allegations levied against us. For sure, a person with a orientation towards young girls is going to find them attractive and pleasing to the eyes and pleasant company to be around. Just as a male heterosexual would find being around women to be attractive and pleasing to the eyes, pleasant company to be around. Yet we do not go around and declare that it is impossible for men and women to be able carry on conversations with each other. Obviously there are going to be differences in the experiences of a sixteen year old as compared to a twenty-seven year old. Or say to a fifty year old? Just as there are going to be differences between a sixteen year old and a twelve year old. Or between a man and a woman. The experiences that a white woman has are going to be different than that of a black man. There will be differences in perspective between an American and a Russian, a Frenchman and an English woman. Chances are that it will be difficult to relate two people from the exact same city or town who have lived all their lives in the same neighborhood together! Yet very few of us would arbitrarily declare it impossible for intelligent conversation to take place between any of these groups. What makes the Paederotic so special in this regard?

Yet one of the most common arguments our opponents use when accusing us of bad intentions is to ask ‘What could a grown man of [insert age in digits here] have to talk about with a child?’ Oh let me count the ways… Some of us recall our childhood very vividly. We remember the hazing the exclusions the crushing feelings of being all alone. It would have been nice if someone had been able to reasure us that life does get better. The people you know in High School you’ll likely never see again until your reunion in ten twenty years. Some of us are artistically inclined, and enjoy discussing the arts with someone just discovering their talents for the first time. Others among us have hobbies that they thankfully never quite outgrew, such as being members of an anime club and as such love to discuss their favorite anime series with others. Maybe they’re into sports? Or they have a common interest in acting and like to discuss Shakespeare. Our opponents insist that children are ignorant of these things and so cannot have intelligent discussions, rather than mentoring children in shared interest as was once done.

Another great fallacy I see repeated time and again is the “When I was your age…” an argument that assumes that all times and situations are the same. They’re not. What may have been true for you when you were a child is no longer necessarily true for those entering their teens now. There is an unsurmountable gulf that occurs in the translation when you try to base current events off of experiences that happened to you ten, twenty, thirty years ago. Your memories are not a substitute for reality as today’s youth experience it. The map changes constantly and what works for one will not work for another. Worse, memory is a faulty mechanism for storing experience, because its like a VCR tape, it gets warped by the act of remembering. The same experience can be at times humiliating, hilarious, and depressing depending upon what state you yourself are in when playing them back. A raw break up can be humiliating at first when it happens— then depressing as you deal with the pangs of loneliness— and finally hilarious some years later when recalled in a social situation with friends who also suffered bad breakups. Furthermore, since the chemical balance of the body fluctuates over time, the composition of testosterone, adrenaline, and other emotion and mood altering chemicals skews the possibility of correctly recalling the situation later.

To develop this point further, it is common for an adult to tell a child, as if handing down wisdom from on high, that they aren’t able to understand a thing now, but they will once they are themselves older. What these adults lose sight of is that just as we grow into understanding we also grow into ignorance of what true childhood was like. Some of us are more in touch with our childhood than others, Bill Watterson anyone? Charles Shultz? There is a reason why Calvin and Hobbes and the Peanut gang were so powerful, it was because the artists behind them remembered childhood and were able to evoke enough of the memory to make us recall it also— as it was, not as we wished it to be! So next time you’re tempted to make this argument, please try to remember that just as there are things in our experiences that change about us as we gain in experience, there are also things that we lose in the process. The gulf of understanding is not as so many like to pretend solely a one way street from them to us, it is also from us to them.

On Inevitability (Or How to Create a Self-Fullfilling Prophecy)

One of the biggest challenges our community faces and must meet head on or be destroyed by is the lie that we are condemned to be controlled by our attractions. An odd dichotomy develops from this assumption and shows up when our opponents tell us to ‘Get Help!’ whilst insisting our future career as a rapist is inevitable. They call us ticking time bombs and insist even if we do get help we will still become the monsters the fear because we have ‘uncontrollable’ urges. As a direct result each year hundreds of young people with no hope will attempt suicide and some of them will succeed. All because these young pedophiles were told their feelings will unavoidibly turn them into serial child rapists. Sadly far too many of you would say in genocidal harshness ‘Good riddance!’ And yet there is the objection to being called genocidal—yet what else would you call a those who advocates the murder of an entire class of people?

Most scientist now accept that sexual orientation begins at a very young age. There is still some debate on exactly what age and the debate rages on to whether orientation is a choice, a result of genetic and or physical changes in the brain as it develops, or some other unknown factor. Interestingly enough the self-actualized pedophile will tell you his or her realization of attractions to younger children itself occurred at a young age. Logically this means right now, at this moment there are hundreds of thousands of children and teenagers discovering their attractions for the first time. And the thoughts running through their heads are wondering how long it will be before they inevitability molest a child. Some of them are already making their first attempt at suicide because of this. Others are ruthlessly suppressing their feelings and will become raging Child Advocates while mercilessly whipping themselves where no one can see until they have in their guilt forged a scarlet letter of their own— while others will make the journey to self-discovery and eventually reach the insight that an orientation is not a crime, it is not an act of violence nor is it a sin— orientation just is; breaking the law is the crime, molesting a child the act of violence, exploiting someone for their personal gratification is the sin.

This is the hardest part of self-actualization. It may be painful to admit to a taboo orientation, it may be hard to accept that you’re one of the hated few but the toughest, most painful insightful is when you realize that you’ve been lied to and you are not, do not have to become a bad person. That you are not made a monster by default. That you are not a rapist by default.

Sadly many pedophiles never come to this realization. Worse many of those who have been sent to those jokes the government likes to call Sexual Offender Treatment programs are actually forced to accept the ideology of inevitability in order to be able to leave prison! Many of those who have come out of SOT programs have told of being made to confess to things they didn’t do as well as attempting to brainwash them. Horror stories are told of being held accountable for a mystic rape by way of a photograph. Sorcerous abilities to molest figments of the imagination have been reported as crimes in some places when a man is arrested for sexually explicit stories that have harmed no one. The end result is that many people have been conditioned to fail.

For Their Own Good: The Minor as a Sex Offender

And here is where we loop back to the beginning of this post. Increasingly we have begun to see the criminalization of childhood sex play—even between minors of the same age! Time was, we wouldn’t have batted an eye over that old childhood game ‘I’ll show you mine, If you’ll show me yours‘ but in these sad days it blasphemy! Heretical to even speculate that children might be sexual beings from birth! To acknowledge that there is no pathology in sex but that which is placed from without! ‘Obscenity!’ Our opponents screech belligerently as they insist to not be bothered with the facts, ‘They’ve already made up their mind and they know what they know.’ And it seems they know sex is dirty, disgusting and only necessary for the reproduction of the human race. With these types of attitudes is it any surprise the western world is suffering the lowest population growth of all time?

The end result? We have in the United States the previously mention Leah DuBuc case, as well as many many other children, the very ones that our opponents claim they seek to protect enrolled as sex offenders! How can this be? I thought we were told repeatedly childhood is a time of innocence! The child is in themselves incapable of sexual thoughts! How can we have children who are sex offenders?!? How is this possible?

How can a fifteen year old girl be charged for creating webcam videos and photos of herself with the laughably insane charge of abuse of a minor? Are we to understand that she is guilty of self-abuse? What gives us the right to ruin the lives of others simply because they do not conform to the standards of childhood we have imposed? What of six year-old boy was suspended for alleged sexual harassment? How about the thirteen year old Utah girl–a teen mom now also a sex offender because her boy friend was a year younger than herself? There are hundreds of cases like those being sent through the so called criminal ‘justice’ system every day! And who sits at judgment at these cases? Do we truly have a jury trial of peers for these children? Assuming that their cases ever go to trial are they charged as the children they are or do we expect them to be tried as adults so that adults can punish them for failing to comply with their standard of childhood? When we are sentencing children as young as ten to be sex offenders do we even try to consider the ramifications this will have on their entire lives? It’s no joking matter! This is our future we’re destroying here!

Is it truly worth it to all you so called ‘Child Advocates’ to destroy the lives of so many young men and women, just so you can look tough on crime? So you can imprision someone who likes to read sexy stories about children? Just to score one more re-election? When the real problem is and has always been parents and other family members?

–I*Love*Green*Olives

A Little Note: The Link Change Game…

This is just a quick note to explain why the blog posts may seem to be changing their order on the page on and off in the next few weeks…

Basically it works out like this, I dislike people who just randomly spout off accusations, like this person seems to do, and as such if I can I like to put in a link to the things I discuss here in this blog.

Unfortunately, not every one likes it when their words are exposed to a place where they could be investigated by critical thinkers, such as the ones who read here. So when these people discover that someone has linked to their words they either begin to delete the comments in question, or they begin playing what I call the ‘Link Changing Game’ and simply rename the files and or links to the words they wish to keep hidden, thus breaking the link I’ve made to them.

For example, she recently made an accusation that Lindsay Ashford has been providing direct links to child porn on his website and has yet to substantiate her claims. For more details, please read the migrating post below entitled: The Big Lie. Since I have yet to discover such a thing on his site, nor have quite a few others in the Paederotic community we’ve been clamoring for proof and attempting to show the world her words are baseless, for indeed would it not be in her best interests to put up a link to where in Lindsay’s website there is child porn–if it really exists will not this revelation prove to the world he is a liar and as a result cause his peers to shun him? So I posted a link to her (I believe baseless) post and allegations, entitled:

oh-dear-lindsay-ashfords-all-upset.html

Only today, when I did a cursory link check I discovered that she had broken the link to her post by renaming it to:

lindsay-ashfords-all-upset-with-media.html

Now I must ask, before I need to run out the door to get to work (I work on the weekends, slightlymore details to follow in my next series of postings–I promise!) If her allegations are true,

A) Why does she not substantiate them?

B) Why does she hide her words by breaking the permlinks she herself provides?

…Or…and I’ll try to say this as softly as I can–is this all because Ms Magnolia knows her words are false and is willing to do what ever it takes to abridge our human right to speech, the right to make our voices heard? Hmmmm….

I*Love*Green*Olives

Pay No Attention To Daddy…

Well then!

When I started this blog I expected people to give me grief– I knew for sure that I’d be seeing the typical cries for censorship (hasn’t happened yet but I know its inevitable) from those who would misunderstand my purpose with this blog in the Child Advocates’ quarters, but I hadn’t expected my use of the phrase ‘Pay no attention to Daddy’ to raise so much ire from the pedophile side of things. I’ve just posted a message at Girl Chat in response to a Pedophile Father who objected to my choice of words, saying that I was implying that all Fathers abuse their children by my choice of words. I never meant to imply that anymore than I’d attempt to imply (like has been said by some radical feminist) a heterosexual male is a rapist by virtue of his gender, subject to compulsion and unable to control his desires. Hmmm… strange, that sounds like the description many try to label the Paederotic with….funny that.

I’m sure there are plenty of pedosexual fathers who have never neglected, beaten, or sexually abused their children, just as there are plenty of gay and straight fathers who have never done any of these things. I’d imagine you could do a survey and discover (assuming truthfulness) just what percentage of S&M leather-daddies, furries, water-sports aficionados, scat-eaters, the transgendered, as well as what percentages of foot-fetishist and diaper wearers have never abused their children. The percentages would certainly be surprising, especially if you’ve boughten into the current intellectual dishonesty that seeks to blame all child abuse on the Paederotic. It has been repeated over and over again that 70-90% of children who were abused were so done by family or other adult known to themselves and their parents. Of that number well over half of the abuse was committed by parents. There is a valid reason why so many of us who are Paederotic sarcastically say ‘Pay no attention to Daddy.’ It is because well over 50% of the time child abuse is occurring at the hands of parents and instead of stopping the abuse the Child Advocates say that the parents are just ’sick’ and in need of help–so ‘Daddy’ gets reduced jail time (if any!), is allowed conjugal visits, and more or less has their behavior ignored because their children are considered legally to be property!

The Big Lie

There are a lot of lies told about the Paederotic. There are tales about the mysterious powers we are supposed to have. There are inflated numbers… (Over three billion in the United States alone!!!!!11111oneone ) and there are inflated numbers (Child Porn a 20 Billion Dollar Industry) and then there are inflated numbers… (Each pedophile will rape at least sixteen children in their lifetime!!!!oneoneone111)

The latest ‘Big Lie’ is different. This one is that ‘international pedophile leader’ Lindsay Ashford’s site has child porn on it. And like all other big lies it originated somewhere out in the ether and no one can seem to find the original source for the information. It just gets passed along by anyone who hears it without substantiation. Worse yet, people assume that since Lindsay has ‘come out of the toy box‘ as a Minor Attracted Adult that the allegation must be true. Without even attempting to check things our for themselves. Without asking him about it or giving him the chance to remove the link if one of the sites he links to externally underwent new ownership without him being aware of it. No, people saw it on teh interweb so it must be true…

The funny thing is, I’m Paederotic and Lindsay Ashford is not my leader. Truth be told, I don’t even like the man. I find him abrasive and unnecessarily didactic at times when he posts. I try not to allow these things to cause me to lose sight of the brave thing he and a few others have done by coming out of the toy box by making their identities public and so despite how I may or may not feel about the man personally I respect him very much for his contribution to the Paederotic community. (No offense I hope Lindsay! ^_~) All that said and he’s still not my leader. He’s not even the leader of any of the Paederotic that I talk with regularly online. He has even resigned his role on other community oriented websites so as to avoid even the appearance of being a leader. If you ask him, he will tell you himself he is no one’s leader. If you head over to Girl Chat you’d see that there are many who will be only too happy to agree with him– at least as far as this subject is concerned anyway!

All that said, what’s really bothersome is the idea that people are so unscrupulous they would lie to shut out the voice of another from the public spectrum. Here is a man who has (as far as I know) no criminal background, whose personal information can be looked up and compared with his photograph, who has gone out of his way so far as to create an automated complaint form with which to use to submit complaints about his website to the relevant authorities—a man whose made it appallingly easy to defame himself—all for the purpose of demonstrating with his own life that it is indeed possible to be Paederotic without being a criminal. A man who in word and deed does everything he can think of to help children, and failing to find any actual fault with the man his critics are so desperate to shut him up that they need to make up a bogus child porn accusation to defame him with.

It only goes to show you how bankrupt his opponents are if this is the best they can come up with.

It makes one wonder how much else our opponents have to say is untrue?

Regardless of whatever else happens we can be sure of at least one thing about this situation; it works as a great illustration of how the ‘Big Lie‘ method is still alive and well….

–I*Love*Green*Olives

PS: After I went typed this I noticed on this blog another example of how dishonest our opponents are. This woman posts the details of several horrifying crimes and the ties them to the Paederotic by mentioning the two subjects in the same breath. Now she is out and out accusing Ashford of insitgating the terrible rape of an infant. Oddly enough she skirts the fact that once again it is Daddy who has committed this crime. Yet another example of how dishonest and morally bankrupt these people are—unwilling to deal with the mess at their own doorstep, they’d rather blame the Paederotic and defame Lindsay Ashford by way of character association… err.. I meant character assassination but interesting freudian slip nevertheless…

Preventing Child Rape…

My mother, God bless her, knew way back in the 80’s what many parents have only recently begun to understand and put into practice. She really was the original anti-drug and told me at a young age to use her and my father as an excuse to not do drugs. She explained to me how drugs were harmful to the body and could warp the mind into doing things that you’d never think twice about while not high. She explained that while yes she and my father had done drugs back in their youth, they had done so before all the dangers had been fully realized and both of them wished with all their might they had never started. Especially their smoking habit, which as she explained hadn’t had those nice big warnings on the side that they had just begun to acquire by that point.

My father made no bones of telling stories of some of the crazy things he and his friends had done while under the influence of mind altering substances. From tales of pot smoking to stories of being so drunk that he couldn’t stand up straight. I heard stories of how he once wrapped his car around a tree and tales of waking up in the morning and having no idea how he and my mother had made it back home. My mother would patiently wait for my father to finish his stories and carefully redirect my attention away from the humor of the situation and onto the risks taken and the seriousness of the consequences such actions could have. And although both my parents were strong Christians both my mother and my father gave me blanket permission to lie and use themselves as an excuse to not take take drugs. ‘Whatever you need to do to get out of the situation,’ was how I recall one such discussion take place. I was never offered drugs as a teenager, just too much of a loner and too straitlaced as a kid I guess, so I don’t know how exactly I would have handled the situation. Who knows, maybe if I’d taken a few hits off a bong or a few swigs of beer I might have become more social and from there? Who knows? Maybe this blog would be about the free pot movement instead? ; )

In any case, my point is parents have a tremendous amount of power over their children for both good and evil. I’d like to show a way parents can help their children avoid being taken advantage of if they should ever be in a situation where they find themselves in a sexually charged situation with the Paederotic. This is really quite simple and I don’t understand why so many so called ‘Child Advocates’ are reluctant to promote it. If it keeps even one child from being touched in a way they don’t want, isn’t it worth the effort?

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

In that spirit here is The Paederotic Guide to Preventing Your Child from being Taken Advantage of Sexually:

1)Teach your child that his or her body belongs to him or herself. There is no nice way to say this: The more your child is taught to automatically do whatever they’re told by the nearest adult the higher their risk of being in an unwanted situation. If you teach your child that no one has the right to touch them sexually without their consent then they are that much more likely to avoid being touched by a Minor Attracted Adult. If he or she knows that it is their decision that empowers them to say ‘No!’ when the time comes.

2)Tell your child about sex and why his or her parents consider it harmful. Just like my mother taught me about the dangers and risks of drugs, drinking and smoking parents need to sit down with their children and explain to them why sex is in their opinion harmful to them at their age and why it is that society has Age of Consent laws. Tell them (graphically if necessarily) about the physical changes the body goes through during puberty and that attempting to move faster than their bodies are ready could damage and scar them for life. Explain about how the hormones flooding their bodies could cause them to make decisions they may regret later and if need be tell them about your own first time. Its a open secret that nearly everyone is dissatisfied with their first time. In any case, they’re only [insert age here] and they have their entire life to experiment with sex, why rush it?

3)Ask your child (after you have done the above) to not experiment sexually with anyone older than themselves by [insert appropriate number here] including hugs and kisses. You may refer to #2 when doing so, so your child understands why you’re telling them this. Empowering your child to know they can say ‘Thanks, but no thanks!’ when approached by a MAA means that they can avoid bad situations more easily. The Paederotic are far more likely to accept an informed rejection of their advances than just about any other group because they believe in the child’s right to consent.

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

There you have it! A simple three step guide to preventing your child from a bad situation with the Paederotic. The key point here is obviously communication and empowering your child to say ‘No!’ if he or she doesn’t want to be touched in a sexual manner. Simple right?

What’s that you say? The guide doesn’t address manipulation? Doesn’t address what to do with if someone tries to force them into sexual activity? That’s because you’re confusing Paedophilia with Rape. They are two different things. Just because someone is attracted to someone does not make them rapist. Nice one, but no dice –try again.

What’s this now? Oh. You mean you’re afraid if you tell your child they have the right to make decisions about their bodies they might actually say ‘Yes!’ instead of ‘No!’ like you told them to, even if you told them why to say no if they are approached by a Minor Attracted Adult? That’s impossible, not to mention statuary rape! Everyone knows that children under the age of [insert the proper age in your jurisdiction here] are unable to consent to sex; they must have been raped! Hmmm…kind of like it was in the Southern United States during its slavery and Jim Crow period, when it was assumed that since no white woman would ever have sex with a black man he must have raped her! Strange how that’s no longer the case these days—at least if the popularity of all those inter-racial porn sites is any indication. Maybe someone should go and tell all those Blacks on Blondes that they’re raping… On second thought probably not, they’d consider it good advertising. ^_^;

–I*Love*Green*Olives